Re: qjackctl approval/sponsorship?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 10:04 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:39 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239
> > 
> > Final comment says:
> > 
> > > Looks good. I can't give final approval, but this is approve-able in
> > > my opinion. Someone please sponsor Fernando, we need him. :)
> > 
> > So.... where do I go from here? I have other packages I'd like to submit
> > as well (and qsynth[*] is waiting and has had no comments so far - I
> > doubt it is a perfect package! :-)
> 
> I am not a sponsor unfortunately.
> 
> The NEEDSPONSOR bugzilla says:
> "People should not sit in NEED-SPONSOR status and just expect
> sponsorship.  The
> best way to get sponsorship is to continue doing other work, like reviewing
> other packages, giving helpful advice, or submitting more packages for review. 
> Having approved packages is *NOT* the requirement for gaining cvsextras
> sponsorship.  Instead demonstrating that you understand the packaging guidelines
> and Fedora process to sponsor members is what is necessary to gain sponsorship."
> 
> So my suggestions are:
> 
> 1. Continue to submit RPMs
> 2. Post to this list when you do submit RPMs for review (I'll do the same)
> 3. All of us interested in audio apps should comment in bugzilla

Ok, I'll do... Thanks!
-- Fernando


_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux