Re: qjackctl approval/sponsorship?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 12:39 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191239
> 
> Final comment says:
> 
> > Looks good. I can't give final approval, but this is approve-able in
> > my opinion. Someone please sponsor Fernando, we need him. :)
> 
> So.... where do I go from here? I have other packages I'd like to submit
> as well (and qsynth[*] is waiting and has had no comments so far - I
> doubt it is a perfect package! :-)

I am not a sponsor unfortunately.

The NEEDSPONSOR bugzilla says:
"People should not sit in NEED-SPONSOR status and just expect
sponsorship.  The
best way to get sponsorship is to continue doing other work, like reviewing
other packages, giving helpful advice, or submitting more packages for review. 
Having approved packages is *NOT* the requirement for gaining cvsextras
sponsorship.  Instead demonstrating that you understand the packaging guidelines
and Fedora process to sponsor members is what is necessary to gain sponsorship."

So my suggestions are:

1. Continue to submit RPMs
2. Post to this list when you do submit RPMs for review (I'll do the same)
3. All of us interested in audio apps should comment in bugzilla

Eventually one of the sponsors will wake up and realize that we need you.
I also think that lots of bugzilla traffic will help get packages reviewed and
approved faster as well.

I didn't see your qsynth submission.  I'll make whatever comments I can today.

AG


_______________________________________________
Fedora-music-list mailing list
Fedora-music-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [ALSA Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Users]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux