On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 12:31 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:52:39PM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote: <snip> > > Agreed, an overarching, authoritative strategy, written down and > maintained, would help a lot for these types of discussions and > supporting work. > <snip> > > There are already quite a few searchable bits in the source behind > the page. We could of course work with those without affecting the > content. But doing so without clearly supporting a coherent strategy > probably isn't going to have a huge effect on Fedora's popularity. > > I also don't think anyone's saying the website is deficient -- IMHO > it's the best it's been in a *long* time. I'm all for improving or > reworking the content to be fresh, timely, and high value. It > needn't be an artificial function of trying to "game" SEO. Maybe we > should start with the authoritative written strategy mentioned above. I just wanted to put my .02 in that this discussion sounds like a valuable one. I am glad to see everyone trying to find a happy balance between 'get it done' and 'red tape rules', but at the same time seeking structure for the sake of guiding decisions and enabling volunteers to 'do stuff'. ~ Charles
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora Marketing mailing list -- marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to marketing-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
