On 07/27/2017 10:17 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 05:47:00PM +0000, Justin W. Flory wrote: >> Ideally, all of these efforts would fit nicely underneath the University >> Involvement Initiative, but the feedback we received before was to tie >> these efforts into the Initiative, but it felt like a driver-less car. >> It isn't clear to contributors about how to tie these projects into the >> Initiative because there isn't anyone actively leading development >> forward on it as of today. I think there is a lot of momentum to >> accomplish these tasks, but it felt like a showstopper when we tried to >> "upstream" the work into the Initiative since it didn't feel like there >> was anyone to communicate or work with. > > How about: scrap the Initiative as it was and propose *this* as a new > initiative? > My opinion is that it would be the same to reboot the initiative or to propose what we have now as the new one, but I think the missing ingredient is a driver to help move things forward. This would be something I am interested in, but I wouldn't have the time to devote the attention I think something like this needs until early 2018. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora Marketing mailing list -- marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to marketing-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
