Re: Fedora 24 G11N talking points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2016 10:22 AM, pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


On 29 June 2016 at 22:10, Justin W. Flory <jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 06/28/2016 11:35 PM, pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



        On 29 June 2016 at 02:13, Justin W. Flory <jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx>
        <mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:

            On 06/27/2016 11:33 AM, pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
        <mailto:pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx>
            <mailto:pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx>>
        wrote:

                Hi,

                   I am just wondering how can we promote improvement in
        Fedora
                24 from
                G11N side. We have already drafted major points in Wiki. [1]
                  Do you think having post in Magazine good here?  Any other
                ideas? :)

                Thanks,
                Pravin Satpute



        1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N/Fedora_24_Talking_points
                (Created
                new page, since General talk page was more on products
        side and
                IMO G11N
                was not fitting well into it.)


            Hey Pravin!

            Regarding your original idea, are you meaning to say you'd
        like to
            get feedback from everyday users about translations and
        feedback in
            Fedora to see their opinions?


        That will be great, to get these kind of feedback. Presently we
        are very
        much dependent on testing day and bugzilla.



            Looking at the wiki page, it seems like more of an update on the
            internationalization / globalization efforts going on in Fedora,
            which is awesome! For this data, though, I would probably
        publish on
            the Community Blog instead of the Magazine. We could
        probably do a
            short "pointer" post on the Magazine to the CommBlog article to
            increase some outside exposure from users there too.


        Actually, i was interested to tweak this information from magazine
        perspective but agree with you by saying present contents suits to
        communityblog :)
        I will prepare first draft, may be this week and then we can
        again think
        again about suitability. I am happy with both case (Magazine or
        Communityblog with pointer in Magazine)

        Thanks,
        Pravin Satpute


    I think either way would work well. Depending on the angle you want
    to take (or maybe even both), we could try putting out an article
    about this on either platform. If you want to write something up on
    one platform, we can always port to the other one fairly easily.

    Drop us a line once you're ready for it to be reviewed. :)


Took must more time than expected :(
Post is ready in pitch state now. https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13838
Let me know your review about it :)
May be need more cleanup.

Thanks,
Pravin Satpute


Unless another editor tackles it before me, I'll make sure this one gets brought up at our regular meeting time on Thursday. Thanks for working on this, Pravin! :)

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux