Re: Fedora 24 G11N talking points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/28/2016 11:35 PM, pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


On 29 June 2016 at 02:13, Justin W. Flory <jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:jflory7@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    On 06/27/2016 11:33 AM, pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:pravin.d.s@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

        Hi,

           I am just wondering how can we promote improvement in Fedora
        24 from
        G11N side. We have already drafted major points in Wiki. [1]
          Do you think having post in Magazine good here?  Any other
        ideas? :)

        Thanks,
        Pravin Satpute


        1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N/Fedora_24_Talking_points
        (Created
        new page, since General talk page was more on products side and
        IMO G11N
        was not fitting well into it.)


    Hey Pravin!

    Regarding your original idea, are you meaning to say you'd like to
    get feedback from everyday users about translations and feedback in
    Fedora to see their opinions?


That will be great, to get these kind of feedback. Presently we are very
much dependent on testing day and bugzilla.



    Looking at the wiki page, it seems like more of an update on the
    internationalization / globalization efforts going on in Fedora,
    which is awesome! For this data, though, I would probably publish on
    the Community Blog instead of the Magazine. We could probably do a
    short "pointer" post on the Magazine to the CommBlog article to
    increase some outside exposure from users there too.


Actually, i was interested to tweak this information from magazine
perspective but agree with you by saying present contents suits to
communityblog :)
I will prepare first draft, may be this week and then we can again think
again about suitability. I am happy with both case (Magazine or
Communityblog with pointer in Magazine)

Thanks,
Pravin Satpute


I think either way would work well. Depending on the angle you want to take (or maybe even both), we could try putting out an article about this on either platform. If you want to write something up on one platform, we can always port to the other one fairly easily.

Drop us a line once you're ready for it to be reviewed. :)

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory
jflory7@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux