Re: Fedora development of Snap packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 17:08 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 19:26 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> > So I was rather surprised by this Softpaedia article today:
> > http://news.softpedia.com/news/snap-packages-become-the-universal-bin
> > ary-format-for-all-gnu-linux-distributions-505241.shtml
> > It claims that Canonical state that they have been working with
> > Fedora developers to make this the universal packaging format.
> > The snapcraft.io site instructions say to use a COPR by a Canonical
> > employee who is not a Fedora packager.
> > Does anyone in marketing or development now what the article is
> > referring to and what's going on?
> 
> Snappy fundamentally relies on apparmour to do confinement (i.e. it
> doesn't use filesystem namespaces like flatpak), how does this work on
> fedora? You can't use selinux and apparmour at the same time, so this
> shouldn't be able to work, unless they disable the containment feature.

Right now, apparently, their install instructions tell you to disable
SELinux.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
Fedora Marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux