----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@xxxxxxx> > > I'd say forget about the name; it's one with some good history and name > > recognition. Instead, rehabilitate it. Show the world that developers > > *do* care about whether Rawhide actually works and that they actually > > want to see bug reports. Then people might actually start coming back. > > All of the above said, I'm cautiously open to this possibility, if if > there's agreement that we can make it work. I'm +1 to this vs. finding a new name. Returning Rawhide to its "former glory" is much more interesting than picking a new name and trying to explain that to users and all the work that goes with that. (Both are going to be work, but I prefer the work of "let's fix Rawhide and tell that story to the world," over "let's fix Rawhide and rename it." Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
