On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 18:34 +0200, Gabriele Trombini wrote: > I think they still have worth for the users. E.g. many of them need > the > screenshot when are going to write installation notes in their locale > or also are useful to see in advance the desktop and so on. Well, I don't know how many users pick screenshots from the wiki. We didn't have them for F22 and we received no complaints. Unfortunately, we have no metrics on this, so I'm just assuming that the screenshots aren't used too much. It's much easier for people to take screenshots on their own systems than to fetch them from our wiki page which isn't well advertised. > > Its also a question of brand: doesn't provide screenshots may appear > as > a lack of care. getfedora.org does have images on the products. If we do a screenshot library, could we maybe have a link to this on getfedora.org? Something like "See more screenshots!". The one issue I have with this is that the wiki isn't the most posh place to host a screenshot library if we're thinking of advertising it to users. Should we use the wiki as an image dump for ourselves and then put the best up on Flickr or something with CC licenses? (Flickr or another open source image platform) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
