So, thinking some about the content-for-contributors blog idea. I had asked Ryan and Chris if they could go ahead with working on a Council blog, but in the open floor meeting today there was some enthusiasm for being broader than that. I don't want to call such a blog "Fedora Contributor Blog" or similar, though, because that's basically duplicating the Planet in a centralized way — something I think we don't need. So, I guess, multi-part question. First, is it worth doing this _at all_, or should we wait for the Fedora Hubs? The contributor-focused content could be presented in some way (as feed items on the hub, say). In that case, the council blog would be more focused to "okay, here's a place for Matthew and other council members to put official stuff", and everything else (election surveys, weekly graphs and charts of metrics, Fedora Objective RFCs, etc.) could be on the Hub. But, I don't want to put so much requirement-pressure on Hubs that it collapses before launch by being asked to do too much. Second, if people think it's worth going ahead with a more-contributor-focused blog, what about reusing the Fedora Insight name (and url, for that matter) from a few years ago? It's catchy, and sounds somewhat insider-y (while not seeming closed-off). What do you think? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
