How about denoting the audience in the tags? I agree that splitting the content with categories could end up with both communities missing out on valid and useful articles.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:37:57AM -0500, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> Still not sold on those categories, tbh.
> Maybe expand it a bit to something like this:
> * News
> * Community News
> * Applications
> * Five Things
> * Tips & Tricks
> Want to try to avoid specifying the audience as a category, rather
> catergorize the posts on content than audience...
> sorry if that doesnt make sense :(
It makes sense just fine. I'm just not convinced. :)
Your categories seem good too, but basically the audience question is
the only reason I can think to really have categories _at all_ rather
than just tags. We've had several discussions about not wanting to
overwhelm users with contributor-focused content, but we _do_ have a
lot of that too, and no where good to put it, and I don't want to
start a _second_ blog....
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List info or to change your subscription:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing