On Jan 27, 2015 6:37 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 01/26/2015 11:23 PM, Chris Roberts wrote:
> > I am +1 to this as well, There has not been that many "unique" authors
> > and its tied to their fas so if we decided to go this route I can send
> > an email to them asking if its ok.
>
> I'm almost sure we've had this conversation before. Can somebody go
> through the archives and see if we've reached a conclusion, before we go
> off and do something that might be contradictory?
>
> There may also be a Fedora-wide contribution policy, and we also don't
> want to contradict that.
>
> Finally, we ought to have this up on the wiki:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine/Howtopost
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine
>
> I believe this is the specific license used by the wiki:
>
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/
>
> Is there a way that the author can do an "I agree to this license"
> checkbox or something the first time they sign in/contribute?
>
> Best,
>
> jzb
> --
>
The fedora-wide contribution policy, per the current CLA, is ~"default to CC-BY-SA unless specifically stated otherwise." Under those terms, all magazine posts have inherited CC-BY-SA; the magazine just didn't present the licensing info.
--Pete
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
