I know we had this conversion before but I agree we should look and see if anything came of it or if it went to a black hole. Joe I think there is a way to do this, more than likely a plugin. I will look for some today and we can test it on the stg instance and see which one works best, and once we all come to a decsion on the license we can add that into the plugin. - Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> To: marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:37:17 AM Subject: Re: Magazine content license On 01/26/2015 11:23 PM, Chris Roberts wrote: > I am +1 to this as well, There has not been that many "unique" authors > and its tied to their fas so if we decided to go this route I can send > an email to them asking if its ok. I'm almost sure we've had this conversation before. Can somebody go through the archives and see if we've reached a conclusion, before we go off and do something that might be contradictory? There may also be a Fedora-wide contribution policy, and we also don't want to contradict that. Finally, we ought to have this up on the wiki: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine/Howtopost http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine I believe this is the specific license used by the wiki: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ Is there a way that the author can do an "I agree to this license" checkbox or something the first time they sign in/contribute? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
