On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:03:29PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I've no qualms about having this kind of opinion piece. I did want to > say that I think Fedora Magazine on the whole should retain a > user-centric slant, and not get too focused on internal community > issues. Hmmm. I agree, but... we also need a central focus for running things that are about internal community issues. I am working on some stuff about project objectives (as part of the new fedora council), and I can do it as mailing list posts but I'd really like it to be more... blog posty, with discussion to follow. I can set up my own personal FPL blog, but... I'm historically terrible at that whereas it turns out to be easier for me to be _part_ of something, if that makes sense. And, it would kind of be nice to have a central place for things which _are_ more internal. The Fedora Council seems like a good example — a general overview makes a good user-focused article, but details beyond that are probably more interesting to contributors, and the elections articles (like the interviews we were talking about) are _meant_ for contributors. I know Ryan was talking about wanting to reduce the number of categories. What if we made it just two, for user-focused and contributor-focused articles? Maybe keeping 5tFTW as a separate thing which covers both — or, possibly splitting that into two separate posts, one for each category (and probably removing the "5" from both, because speaking from experience 10 total would be crazy). -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
