On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 10:17:37AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:29:02AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > My main question was more around opening the door to a Fedora > > publication to opinion pieces, and what might that lead to down the road. > > > > * Do we accept any opinion pieces? > > > > * Is there a process to saying "uh, sorry - we don't think this meets > > our standards?" > > I think this needs to be more of an editorial space than a > letters-to-the-editor section. I think anything we run needs to: > > 1) Aim to advance our overall mission, > 2) be in line with and promote the Fedora foundations, and > 3) obviously, but let's say it: follow the Fedora code of conduct. > > I don't know if we need more process than just saying that and trusting our > submitters and editors; I hope we don't. I've no qualms about having this kind of opinion piece. I did want to say that I think Fedora Magazine on the whole should retain a user-centric slant, and not get too focused on internal community issues. This doesn't mean I'm against running this article. In the larger view I would like to avoid having too many of such articles. The magazine could easily become less interesting over time to wider audiences if that happened. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
