On 08/06/2014 10:00 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 08/06/2014 03:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks
that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it
easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple
people covering the same talk.
How do we feel about combining a few talks into one post?
I attended the keynote, a talk on QA and a talk on Copr so far today.
Already wrote up the keynote, but not sure I'm going to get a full post
out of the QA talk. Any strong objections to doing a post that looks at
more than one talk?
I think combining them if they're related makes sense, but it's better to
not combine QA and Coprs even if each result is short. (Headline the QA talk
with the quote about Rawhide bugs _probably_ not being a demonic hand
reaching out of the monitor to strangle you?)
I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we
might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but
whatever.
I did combos last year.... basically I did a brief synopsis for every
talk, one blog post per day. Got really good coverage and every post got
LWN coverage.
FWIW
~m
--
marketing mailing list
marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
