On 08/06/2014 03:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>> So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks >>> that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it >>> easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple >>> people covering the same talk. >> How do we feel about combining a few talks into one post? >> I attended the keynote, a talk on QA and a talk on Copr so far today. >> Already wrote up the keynote, but not sure I'm going to get a full post >> out of the QA talk. Any strong objections to doing a post that looks at >> more than one talk? > > I think combining them if they're related makes sense, but it's better to > not combine QA and Coprs even if each result is short. (Headline the QA talk > with the quote about Rawhide bugs _probably_ not being a demonic hand > reaching out of the monitor to strangle you?) I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but whatever. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
