----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: jzb@xxxxxxxxxx, "Fedora Marketing team" <marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:49:55 AM > Subject: Re: Copyright Submission Proposal > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:42:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Hey all, > > To streamline this whole thing, can we just agree to publish all content > > on the magazine (and ask authors to agree) on a single Creative Commons > > license? > > I would *personally* prefer the most restrictive of the CC licenses (CC > > BY-NC-ND 4.0): > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ > > But I'd accept most of the CC licenses. > > Thoughts, comments, flames? > > I think we should ask for BY-SA *without* ND so that we can more easily > reuse the content in other Fedora contexts (documentation, marketing > materials) -- and so other people can use it in non-Fedora contexts with > proper credit. I think that fits best with our mission (and the open content > aspect of it). +1 for CC-BY-SA license. It's something like GPL in software. It makes more freedom while keeping people to respect the license and do share-alike as well. Kind regards, Tuan -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
