On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:42:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > To streamline this whole thing, can we just agree to publish all content > on the magazine (and ask authors to agree) on a single Creative Commons > license? > I would *personally* prefer the most restrictive of the CC licenses (CC > BY-NC-ND 4.0): > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ > But I'd accept most of the CC licenses. > Thoughts, comments, flames? I think we should ask for BY-SA *without* ND so that we can more easily reuse the content in other Fedora contexts (documentation, marketing materials) -- and so other people can use it in non-Fedora contexts with proper credit. I think that fits best with our mission (and the open content aspect of it). I understand the rationale behind wanting NC, but it's actually on our list of unacceptable licenses in Fedora. See <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3> -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
