On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 05:22:37PM +0200, Zoltan Hoppar wrote: > I think weekly basis is much better, as the next Fedora release is not > earlier as 2013-11-26. So, having retrospective with inserts from > earlier conference pictures, and features made we together, and > running systems, FPLs.... I think let it be 10 week 10 interview with > inserts, documentary like - and visualization of as the code has > evolved. Gource vid as insert perhaps? Community size, registered > projects, number of features per release.... perhaps... Well, that seems a bit much to 1) produce and 2) promote to me. However, I won't stand in the way of others if they're going to do the work. I'll commit to taking on some of a 12-month thing, but the prior results of a weekly plan (dropped on floor) make me suspect that a weekly pace is a bit much. Any other thoughts? I'm happy to start creating Trac tickets for the project and putting together a plan on the wiki... or content to let someone else take lead on that and help where needed/where I can. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Open Source and Standards, Red Hat jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
