On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 02:56:47PM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Paul Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Robyn Bergeron > > <robyn.bergeron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:06:50AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >>>> The user management interface redesign is a "tech preview" in F13, as > >>>> opposed to final. Unfortunately the Desktop SIG members working on > >>>> the feature aren't able to comfortably make it a default yet, because > >>>> there are a few integration pieces left to complete. It will still be > >>>> available for installation and use, but not enabled by default, in > >>>> F13. > >>>> > >>>> Should we remove this point from the talking points list for user > >>>> features? Doing so would still leave five points in that category. > >>> > >>> Hm, also found that the "yum langpack" feature has been moved off for > >>> now as well. I sent a note to FESCo asking them to notify the > >>> Marketing and Docs teams in the future when features are dropped. > >>> There should be no more feature dropping this cycle, but it would be > >>> good to hear about it sooner in F14. > >>> > >>> Still leaves four points for users, which is well within the 3-5 range > >>> we originally wanted to include. > >> > >> Okay - I'm going to delete the langpack stuff off of Talking Points, > >> since we have the rule of "no talking points that aren't on feature > >> list," iirc. (Or maybe that was never officially decided, but I'm > >> going with it for now.) > >> > >> But - user account dialog is still in feature list, at 100%. Do we > >> call it experimental user management interface, techpreview user > >> management interface, or ... ? > >> > >> Thoughts? Anyone? > > > > I'd remove it from the talking points. It's OK for other material to > > reference it, just like we can continue to reference the Moblin Spin > > even if its content may be a little in flux. The announcement text > > refers to the new user account dialog work as "experimental" which is > > accurate -- it's a WiP. As for Moblin, the Spin is still something > > approved even if there's no "Moblin 2.2" per se. We can still > > reference it and refer to the current content as paving the way for a > > MeeGo based spin, I would think. > > Okay, i removed the user account dialog stuff from talking points. We > left it in the beta announcement and listed it as experimental (rrix, > ke4qqq and i talked about it Friday night) - does this seem > reasonable? Makes sense to me. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
