On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Paul Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Robyn Bergeron > <robyn.bergeron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 5:20 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 08:06:50AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>>> The user management interface redesign is a "tech preview" in F13, as >>>> opposed to final. Unfortunately the Desktop SIG members working on >>>> the feature aren't able to comfortably make it a default yet, because >>>> there are a few integration pieces left to complete. It will still be >>>> available for installation and use, but not enabled by default, in >>>> F13. >>>> >>>> Should we remove this point from the talking points list for user >>>> features? Doing so would still leave five points in that category. >>> >>> Hm, also found that the "yum langpack" feature has been moved off for >>> now as well. I sent a note to FESCo asking them to notify the >>> Marketing and Docs teams in the future when features are dropped. >>> There should be no more feature dropping this cycle, but it would be >>> good to hear about it sooner in F14. >>> >>> Still leaves four points for users, which is well within the 3-5 range >>> we originally wanted to include. >> >> Okay - I'm going to delete the langpack stuff off of Talking Points, >> since we have the rule of "no talking points that aren't on feature >> list," iirc. (Or maybe that was never officially decided, but I'm >> going with it for now.) >> >> But - user account dialog is still in feature list, at 100%. Do we >> call it experimental user management interface, techpreview user >> management interface, or ... ? >> >> Thoughts? Anyone? > > I'd remove it from the talking points. It's OK for other material to > reference it, just like we can continue to reference the Moblin Spin > even if its content may be a little in flux. The announcement text > refers to the new user account dialog work as "experimental" which is > accurate -- it's a WiP. As for Moblin, the Spin is still something > approved even if there's no "Moblin 2.2" per se. We can still > reference it and refer to the current content as paving the way for a > MeeGo based spin, I would think. Okay, i removed the user account dialog stuff from talking points. We left it in the beta announcement and listed it as experimental (rrix, ke4qqq and i talked about it Friday night) - does this seem reasonable? -Robyn > > Paul > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing > -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
