On 03/15/2010 02:53 PM, Max Spevack wrote: > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Max Spevack wrote: > >> I assume that from a package ownership point of view, this is >> virtually trivial? Is there *anything* difficult about integrating >> this package into the rest of Firefox & the distro, or is it really >> basically the easiest package in all of Fedora to own, and could be >> taken off of your hands entirely, thus freeing you of this >> every-now-and-then ping? > > Here's an actual question: > > When I took the fedora-bookmarks.html page and removed some stale ones > and added some new ones, I didn't worry about any of the metadata that > went with the bookmarks. > > Compare: > > <DT><A HREF="http://fedoraproject.org/"; ADD_DATE="1158286779" > LAST_VISIT="1176675005" LAST_MODIFIED="1176675285" LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8" > ID="rdf:#$c7+Ar2">Fedora Project</A> > <DD>Home of the Fedora Project. > > Versus: > > <DT><A HREF="http://opensource.com/";>OpenSource.com</A> > <DD>Open Source applied to the world. > > How much does the metadata matter? Man, good question. I think that it might be required per the actual spec, but I don't know how much it matters in practice. Anyway, it's pretty easy to do things the way I outlined in my last mail, so I typically just do it that way which adds all the needed tags, though I do have to manually strip out the ICON ones... -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
