On 03/15/2010 02:14 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 17:02 -0400, Max Spevack wrote: >> Hi, >> >> One of the things we noticed in the Marketing FAD is that Fedora doesn't >> have a standardized process for keeping the default bookmarks that we >> ship in fedora-bookmarks.rpm updated. >> >> I've taken the liberty of cleaning up the following page, which hadn't >> been touched in several releases: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Bookmarks >> >> I'd like to get the following issues sorted out: >> >> (1) The format in which the fedora-bookmarks package owner (Matthias) >> would like the bookmarks for any given release to be delivered. Is what >> I've done ok, or would you prefer something else? > > I am the owner ? Surprise. I'd be very happy to give that up to someone > who has the bandwidth to keep this package up-to-date. If marketing > wants to play an active role there, feel free to take this over. > > I don't think I have ever touched the package, really. In the past, > caillon was involved with bookmark stuff. Yeah, I wonder how that got assigned to Matthias. Every other release in pkgdb shows it as me, and I'm pretty sure I haven't ever tried assigning it to anyone other than in marketing. Max, is there a better person to maintain this? I'm okay with co-owing and helping out the new maintainer, but I probably shouldn't be the primary owner. For the time being though, I can make the change if this is what marketing's agreed on. Let me know. C -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
