-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > >> Java 6 EE - well the text refers to the Java 6 EE spec, and what's >> left unsaid is that openJDK is what is meeting the spec. However most >> people assume that's java-1.6.0-sun when they see Java 6 EE. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GnuPG with Firefox : http://getfiregpg.org (Version: 0.7.10) iEYEARECAAYFAkuVvSUACgkQkZOYj+cNI1enMQCdHDQ0ivcVE0JPtLKJ6JvurACB JcoAniBm7Jjzh1bp2A9idSZE+YK031TQ =fIx3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > How would you recommend restating this? Can you edit that talking > point to make it so? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Talking_Points#NetBeans_6.8_first_IDE_to_support_entire_Java_6_EE_spec I hope your pointing to victorv with this question. I am only barely on the fringes of the Java community, and only because I admin some JBoss app servers and quite a few Java apps at $dayjob. And reading over this talking point - I am not sure if it my earlier statement is completely on topic - the talking point is referring to NetBeans, not openjdk, though I think the same principle ('Java 6 EE spec' confusion with java-1.6.0-sun) > >> JavaFX SDK appears to not be F/LOSS >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaFX#License) > > Right, mjw was noting this as well. I'm sending a copy of this email > to victorv who's listed as the netbeans maintainer, to get him to edit > this wiki page so that we are promoting only free software. > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing > -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
