Status update: Wiki page has been populated with information from [[Talking points]] category page. Remaining tasks for the wiki page are listed on [[Talking Points SOP]] in the "page progress" section. I'm driving for the next 2 hours, will be back online tonight; in the meantime, anyone who wants to jump in can. If someone wants to dig up emails that were made in past cycles to come up with an announcement for help / finalized decision mail templates, that would be awesome. :) -Robyn On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:39:52AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:53:11AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote: >> >> In the marketing meeting / post-meeting SOP discussion last week, the >> >> timeline was decided of putting out a "call for participation" on the >> >> Talking Points on either Friday or Monday. Since it is now Monday, >> >> we need to do it today :) Which means we need to (1) finalize the SOP, >> >> (2) send out the email to the appropriate lists. >> >> >> >> Ryan Rix and I worked up the Talking Points SOP this evening / >> >> morning. A (very) rough draft is up at >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talking_points_SOP. (We were both >> >> pretty tired but decided to knock out a first go at it; there is >> >> probably some good content missing from what we discussed in last >> >> week's marketing meeting, and post-marketing-meeting Talking Points >> >> SOP discussion. Eyeballs! Feedback! Please!) >> >> >> >> If anyone is around in the morning (7am Pacific, 10am Eastern, ish) - >> >> I will be online finishing the editing on the SOP and sending out the >> >> email CFP on F13 Talking Points. If anyone wants to hop on and help, >> >> that would be AWESOME - or feel free to contribute on the wiki page if >> >> you get to it before I do. One thing I would like to add to the SOP >> >> (since I just thought of it 3 seconds ago!) is the content of the >> >> email to be sent out requesting participation in Talking Points >> >> development. If someone would like to jump in and do that, that would >> >> be great. >> > >> > The page looks great. I think you can also find some helpful >> > information on the [[Category:Talking Points]] page that will help >> > fill in "how to choose points." In fact, I'd be in favor of removing >> > a bunch of that material from the Category page, and just linking back >> > to the [[Talking points SOP]], to avoid duplication of content (and >> > confusion about where the governing stuff is). >> >> WRT the [[Category:Talking Points]] page - I'm going to go ahead and >> move some / most of that stuff to the SOP, to get it looking similar >> to some of the other Category: pages for marketing deliverables - >> [[Category:Release Slogan]], etc. Basically it will have a >> definition, and then a "to find how how this is done, see SOP", with >> the various Talking Points pages from current and older releases >> listed at the bottom as pages in that category. > > Superb! > > -- > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing > -- marketing mailing list marketing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
