On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 11:42 -0500, Paul Frields wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Max Spevack<mspevack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > > That means 9,000 DVDS (and 1,000 magazines) that we would probably use as > > the VAST MAJORITY of our media during the Fedora 12 cycle. > > > > We would probably *not* produce a large quantity of separate LiveCDs, which > > has been the habit for the past several releases. <snip> > In the longer term we really do want to move away from the Install DVD > to a Live DVD that has more relevant applications and content -- as > opposed to the kitchen-sink approach of the Install DVD. But > nevertheless, most people choose the DVD over Live CD because it's > perceived to be "more == better." > > Given that fact, and being rational about our budget, I think it makes > sense to leverage this approach to provide most of our distributable > media. If that's the standard Install DVD, I'm OK with that. We should > ensure the general community understands the reasons for sticking with > the install DVD for purposes of this promotion. Ok, random question. Could we produce a LiveDVD image that would include all of the packages on a normal DVD install (if you didn't customize your choice of packages)? Or does the desktop SIG have a LiveDVD image? Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
