I've also added this to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_print_magazine_proposal#Fedora_to_provide
so we know what we'd need to do in case we decide to go with the "we're
going to print a magazine!" proposal.
Still exploring possibilities, still in need of thoughts and feedback -
is this a good idea? What difficulties - or benefits - or both - do you see?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Fedora print magazine proposal from Linux Pro Magazine
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 22:30:28 -0400
From: Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Mel Chua <mel@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx>
On 09/04/2009 09:58 PM, Mel Chua wrote:
On 09/04/2009 01:06 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
One thing I know that has happened in the past with several print
magazines is that a special DVD had to be made with the .src.rpm's on
it so that they were compliant with GPL provisions. That required a
special spin for that.
Tom, is that still required? With a DVD spin.. one would make a
bigger LIVE cd spin and include the SRPMs on it for those packages.
On 09/04/2009 03:37 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
Yes, the source needs to come with the DVD so that we meet the licensing
provisions. Doing a bigger F12 Live spin with the SRPMs included seems
like the simplest way to handle that.
Is this ok to share with the Marketing list and LPM folks? (I don't see
any reason why not, but wanted to make sure it wasn't already public for
some reason.)
Sure, I see no reason why not.
~spot
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
