Re: foobar platform pre-decision

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/7/15 Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> At the meeting today there was general consensus to use Zikula for the
> Foobar project, mostly under the reasoning of "kill two birds with one
> stone" (Docs Project is also using Zikula) and "upstream is awesome"
> (Zikula devs are very responsive to the needs of Docs, and will be
> responsive to the needs of Marketing)

HUGE +1 on this from me... all my experiences with news.fp.o suggest
that working with other teams on a project like this is a must. The
work to ensure that an application is acceptable to infra, e.g. safe
and packaged etc, is not insignificant, neither is making sure that it
is all configured to meet requirements. Basically, the more the
merrier :)

Jon
>
> We're leaving the subject open until next meeting unless there is a
> major blocker that isn't solved by that time. Flame away!
>
> --
> Ian Weller <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> GnuPG fingerprint:  E51E 0517 7A92 70A2 4226  B050 87ED 7C97 EFA8 4A36
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux