On 07/13/2009 05:42 PM, Leonardo Menezes Vaz wrote: > Why don't we have a kind of LTS version for some releases? That could > be really useful for those users who can't afford RHEL and don't want > use free community rebuilds. Fedora could be an alternative if we had > some version with a longer lifecycle, and I believe this could also > help RedHat too because there would be more people running on servers, > exactly where their product is more used. This has been discussed many times in fedora-devel list before. Since I don't want to rehash the same discussion, I ask you read up on the previous discussions. Rahul -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
