On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 16:20 +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: > Ian Weller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:06:38AM +0200, Nicu Buculei wrote: > >> About signing the release forms, what if we have a cool photo made > >> previously and no chance to meet in person with the subject again very > >> soon? I think it should be OK to ask him to sign and fax the form, I see > >> this used very often in business. Also, how about scanning and sending a > >> scan of the signed form? > >> > > This seems like the sane way to go but spot wanted me to have original > > copies, AFAICT. I'll point him to this message though. > > Faxed/scanned forms would allow to use photos from past event, like > FUDCons from 2008 and this way we can kickstart the book with a large > amount of already existing materials. > Back when I contributed to Red Hat Magazine, it was enough to send by > fax a signed contract, so I expect the policy inside Red Hat to be > consistent. Lawyers have changed a few times recently. The short answer is that you cannot use that form for anything aside from FUDCon. No scanning, no faxing, nothing. RH Legal is working on a digital form that works for our photobook needs. As soon as that shows up, I'll pass it along. Thanks, ~spot -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
