Sure! But the idea behind it is what is valuable, I think! It shows a
simple local file could improve the user experience without having to
alter upstream hard-code, and in an easy to maintain manner. Why not do
it in a persistent way locally, by Fedora Project, the same way logos,
for example, are maintained? Well, if the name of this list is
"expanding the Fedora user base", I think this is a tiny thing that
would do it. But, anyway, this is just my humble opinion (based on what
I hear from users near me). I certainly do not want to populate the
wrong list if this is considered to be the case. Thanks for your comments.
Rahul Sundaram escreveu:
Luis Felipe Marzagao wrote:
I beg to differ regarding this comment:
"For example, changing gconf default behavior is in fact changing the
upstream software. Now Nautilus on Fedora would behave differently."
The Fedora LiveCD, for example, changes default gconf behaviour of
turning screen saver lock off, autologin, logos etc.
These changes are made only for the live cd environment to make Fedora
more suitable as a live CD. You would lose them all once you install
it however. It appears that a nautilus change only for the live cd
environment doesn't add any real value and hence changing the default
file manager behavior is different from the other non-persistent
changes you have pointed out.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
