Re: counting packages (was Re: Fedora Package Status of Aug 12, 2008)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/8/19 Karsten 'quaid' Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> Owners stats:
>>  - 6517 packages
>>  - 10799 binary rpms in devel
>
> Darn, I was afraid of that.  We are all perfectly aware that one package
> (tarball + spec file) can yield more than one binary rpm.

Would it be better to consistently start using a term like component
or module to indicate the tarball+spec+patchset entity...especially
since people are vectoring towards making it possible to work with
explode sources in our buildsystem without generating an srpm
'package' at all.

Yes those people may or may not be smoking crack.. but they appear to
be pretty serious about making it possible to work with some sort of
exploded tree as an option to srpms for some of the components we
maintain...can't really call an exploded tree a package.

-jef

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux