On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 03:15 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jonathan Roberts wrote: > > > So, do people have thoughts about these bullets? Things you'd like to do > > with news.fp.o? Reply and lets see if there are things that need testing > > or whether the workflow is pretty self-explanatory! > > There seems to be still doubts as to whether we are going with lyceum or > wordpress-mu. This is not related to what Jon is talking about. He is looking for how people use a tool to know what to check on the test instance(s) we put in front of him. But to follow your post heist, I'll take a chance to mention ... A few of us with interest in WordPress MU missed the chance to help with the test previously, and we asked if we could take another shot at making it work for Fedora. At our current pace, we'll have a better idea in a week if we need to investigate further in that direction. Until then we won't know which needs to be packaged. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
