On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 00:09 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Rahul Sundaram > > wrote: > >> I thought we were all waiting for the board to discuss this first? > > > > Didn't we hash this out on fab? I guess if we really need a decree, > > I'll see if we can get it on the agenda for this week's meeting..which > > I'm probably going to miss. > > We did hash it out but I had the impression (pretty sure I read it > somewhere) that the board is going to discuss this and make a decision. > I thought that seemed appropriate since it was the board decision to > introduce the feature in the first place. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2008-February/msg00257.html Just making sure this is closed out correctly here. The Board is also in favor of patching out the for-sale plugins, so this issue is no longer hung up there. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
