On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IANAL but if you are in a region that enforce software patents, you > should consider the implications carefully and I can't offer legal > advise on that. If you have content in patent encumbered codecs, feel > free to point them to me and I will take care of the conversion. Thats kind of how I was thinking it might have to work too. :-( At the very least its the safest route. In my experience, when dealing with lawyers its best not to make them cranky. ;-) > I want openly licensed content and not something specific to the DVD > image I put out. The ability to redistribute content as a criteria is > not negotiable. I am ok with some of the content having non-commercial > restrictions though I would prefer not. I'm right there with you. I figured it was a good topic to ask about up front as I'm sure we might run into it as part of the project. Russell -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
