On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 11:35 -0500, Colby Hoke wrote: > Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > > > > That is the crux of the subject of this thread. We are working on a > > plan, yes, and it has already missed the first deadline. Unfortunately, > > when setting the schedule for the marketing plan, we focused on the > > final release. This is typical thinking that applies to RHEL, for > > example, where we do not advertise the beta/release candidates. > Which deadline would that be? Alpha release is a named release and worthy of press/marketing attention: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/9/Schedule This was a self-criticism in the sense that we all sat in a room with Leigh Day, agreed that March was a good deadline for having the marketing plan together, and none of us thought about the upcoming Alpha release. ;-D The final marketing plan needs to start with activity sometime soon after a numbered release, drawing attention to feature work in progress, the ongoing interviews, etc. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr. Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org gpg key : AD0E0C41
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
