On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 12:08 -0800, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 14:40 -0500, Colby Hoke wrote: > > > Anyway, the point is: we want to help. We want to get organized and are > > committed to having the next launch go off with as much organization and > > backing as possible. We want this to continue with future launches as well. > > +1 > > > So, I propose we have our meeting sometime mid next week - say Wednesday > > at 2EST? We can have it on #fedora-mktg if that's fine with everyone. > > Although I used to feel differently, I'm now in favor of using > #fedora-meeting, despite the scheduling challenges. It raises the > visibility of the work and gets discussions in front of many more people > (lurkers) than having it on a stand-alone channel. > > With that, for Wed. the available time slots[1] are: > > 1600 UTC (1 pm EST) > 1900 UTC (4 pm EST) (oops, Colby and I have a conflict then) > > *sigh* Looks like it's time for #fedora-marketing-too (or something.) So I'm not the only person who stumbles on the time -- although I probably do it way more often. :-) 1900 UTC == 1400/2pm EST, 1100/11am PST. Does that make it better? -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
