Re: Fedora struggles with harm reduction via Codec Buddy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 09:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Let's take the scenario a step further.  What happens when someone
> puts a piece of free crippleware into Fedora, the sole purpose of
> which is to upsell to something that isn't crippleware?  How will we
> feel about that?
> 
> This is just the first time we've had to face these kinds of issues.
> As more business concerns coalesce around Fedora, it won't be the
> last.

This is not the correct venue to argue about such things though.  I'd
be happy to argue with people about this elsewhere though!

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project          (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux