Le Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:50:15 -0700, Karsten Wade <kwade@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 15:03 -0400, jkeating wrote: > > > Please keep in mind that id you want to do LLC Fedora, you're going > > to have to do it for Every release. That's the whole reason you > > want Fedora, so you get newer software, etc... otherwise you'd take > > RHEL/CentOS. > > That's one way to do it. But not the only way. There is a middle > ground -- two years of support for every odd numbered version of > Fedora isn't nearly the same thing as *EL. It's really just adding > 11 months to the end of the odd release. The updates available from > the 13 month EOL of F* will still be pretty fresh 11 months later, > especially compared to how crusty the associated *EL release could be > by then. > > Obviously if we chart it all out, we'll see some times of continuity > where the F*odd is lined right up with the *EL version. I'd figure > that any group that wants to do LLC Fedora would spend some time > figuring that out. > > - Karsten RH/CentOS 5 is almost FC6. RH/CentOS is support for 7 years. Next EL release will be based on F-9. (Am I right?) This mean every year and a half you've got a LLC release. What you describe *IS* RH/CentOS. Why do you want Fedora to do this too? M.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
