Re: Spins vs official content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mike McGrath wrote:

> Concerns:
>   1) Keeping the get fedora page simple and clean

Nod - there's a fair chance of it getting cluttered.

>   2) Brand dilution between official and non official spins

Attempting to keep it simple leads to something like:

- -> The download links for Fedora
- -> Official Fedora Spins (where the definition of spins needs to be put
in or, the spins given their own Fedora centric branding)
- -> Other Fedora Spins [linking off to a separate page]

>   3) There could be 30, 50, 100 re-spins this time next year we just
> don't know.

All the more nicer, but spins by their very nature would be drilling
down into niche and nicher audiences :) so a listing by category perhaps
would result eventually


- --

You see things; and you say 'Why?';
But I dream things that never were;
and I say 'Why not?' - George Bernard Shaw
www.linkedin.com/in/sankarshan


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHDYYSXQZpNTcrCzMRAs2JAJ45XIwE7LBiCM2SM8aNext1392WFgCeP7G6
4/SvEAY/rTf1Lbx8hAhrTKg=
=5c76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux