El mié, 19-09-2007 a las 09:47 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht escribió:
> Hi,
>
> there is an distribution-review for recycling old PCs (Pentium I class).
>
> Fedora Suse Ubuntu
>
> Installation with Gnome 3:00h 1:10h 1:45h
> Minimal Installation 1:50 0:30 0:30
> First Update with Gnome 4h 1:10h 0:26h
> Boot in textmode 1:20m 1:10m 1:10m
> Boot with Gnome 2:20m 2:10m 2:20m
>
> Seems Fedora is the slowest to install in low-memory conditions.
>
> The authors states, that although selected in Anaconda the xfce-packages
> were missing and he had to manually install them afterwards.
>
> cu romal
>
1º - German Magazine --> Everybody know that in Germany, Suse Linux has
been, and it is still, very very popular into their Linux communities.
2º - Default Gnome (amount of packages) in Fedora (I'd bet...) has
nothing to do with the Default Gnomme in Suse ("exiled" on behalf of
KDE, the default desktop).
3º - Curiously they try Suse with Gnome, when actually almost nobody
choose that option in Suse.
4º - If they even do fail to mention KDE, I would swear that the
research is clearly self-interested, probably for internal consumption.
Daniel
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
