Davidson Rodrigues Paulo <davidsonpaulo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Education is a task for documentation, not software. I disagree. But, ironically, the CLI addresses that today. ;) > When people follow CLA instructions they need to be educated > in PGP keys, not when they are creating the keys. Now I'm confused. How does this make everything "easier"? And are you advocating them creating the keys _then_ understanding? Or vice-versa? > I'm not talking about GUI building, wizards or user education. > From the start: > * There is a GUI that works in a way it need to work, and it's so > "educational" than the CLI; I didn't understand that statement, and I'm still scratching my head on what you mean by "works in a way it need to work"? > * Using GUI, we can sign a file, but it's not possible finish a CLA > validation signing the file this way because the file is signed as > in "gpg -b --sign [file]", and the Fedora Account System is > configured to recognized files signed as in "gpg -a --sign [file]"; That's a simple binary v. ASCII aspect. I'm still confused here. Is there not the option radio button to change this already? Or are you talking about changing defaults in GUI programs? > * Making some modifications in the GUI that allow users to sign a > file in a way that is compatible with Fedora Account System will > give them a new way to create their CLA without modifying > absolutely nothing in the process (just in _one tool_ used to > acomplish _two steps_ of the process); > Is that, nothing else. I'm still utterly confused here. I guess I'm just clueless. -- Bryan J. Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx http://thebs413.blogspot.com -------------------------------------------------- Fission Power: An Inconvenient Solution -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
