On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:49:42 -0400 "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > And if that still doesn't explain what I'm trying to say, then maybe a > little'ole "devil's advocate" is all I'm doing. I.e., > > - Adding anything not in RHEL or certified against it is a risk > - Having additional packages added to RHEL is a risk when updating > - EPEL mitigates some of that risk more than independent repositories > - But EPEL still doesn't have the guarantees of RHEL itself I have to agree 100%. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com) Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
