On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 23:17 +0100, Benjamin Lewis wrote: > Marek Mahut wrote: > > Karsten Wade wrote: > >> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote: > >>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: > >>>> Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit : > >>>> Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL > >>>> and Fedora > >>> This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again. > >> > >> Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again? > >> > >>> Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think > >>> like > >>> i do. > >> > >> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for > >> Ambassadors. > > > > As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general. > > > > "... that we not connect hats, red in color or otherwise ..."[1] > > > > > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct > > > This may actually pose a problem for me as I regularly (especially in > the rain) wear a black fedora, and a few people have asked me if the > fact I support Fedora is because of, or related to, this. > > Not that I intentionally connect the two, but average folk still seem to > make that link... > If one is linked to Fedora in any way, to be kindly asked to refrain from using symbols such as red hats sounds reasonable to me. I have a hard time believing though, that one just has to buy that *any* hat should be avoided. I mean, that's just something that some people wear. Starting to feel relieved that the much appreciated Linux firm isn't called Green Shirt, or Black Sandal? ;) herman -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
