Marek Mahut wrote: > Karsten Wade wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot: >>>> Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit : >>>> Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL >>>> and Fedora >>> This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again. >> >> Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again? >> >>> Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think >>> like >>> i do. >> >> I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for >> Ambassadors. > > As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general. > > "... that we not connect hats, red in color or otherwise ..."[1] > > > [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors/Conduct > This may actually pose a problem for me as I regularly (especially in the rain) wear a black fedora, and a few people have asked me if the fact I support Fedora is because of, or related to, this. Not that I intentionally connect the two, but average folk still seem to make that link... -- Benjamin Lewis Fedora Ambassador ben.lewis@xxxxxxxxxx ----------------------------------------------------------------------- http://benl.co.uk./ PGP Key: 0x647E480C "In cases of major discrepancy, it is always reality that got it wrong" -- RFC 1118
begin:vcard fn:Benjamin Lewis (tc1415) n:Lewis;Benjamin email;internet:ben.lewis@xxxxxxxxxx x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
