On 5/9/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ladislav Bodnar wrote: > Also, I'd prefer if > any particular complaint/suggestion came directly from the user > community, not from people who have a redhat.com or fedoraproject.org > in their email addresses, since you are likely to be biased.
What is the definition of 'user community?' Would Ladislav rather hear from me? I so dearly love talking to misinformed people in the technical laypress. Or do I not count because I'm an active contributor? I just don't get it. Why is there an arbitrary preference to hear from people who stand outside the process of moving the project forward? Who is allowed to speak for the community, the people who aren't actively involved in setting the direction? How is that unbias, let alone informed. I buy Girl Scout cookies, I guess that makes me perfectly equipped to wax eloquent unbiasedly in a general manner concerning the goals,motivations, and structures of the girl scout organization. -jef"I'd take biased well-informed and thoughtful opinion, over slapdash, first-glance, arms-length, impressionistic poorly researched argumentation any day of the week. I'm really hoping that at some point the technical laypress figures out that my content preferences are worth catering to. Until then I'll just keep reading penny-arcade instead."spaleta -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
