>Herman writes... >Or is there (still) some truth in his statement? Yes, there is truth in it, still. I wrote about this to this group a month or so ago. I won't regurgitate all that here. >"Cons: Less community-oriented than other major distributions....." That's what Distrowatch said. I'd be curious to hear what others think this statement actually means. What do you think "less community-oriented" means? And Rahul has written a wonderfully constructed reply. Don't get me wrong. I like Fedora. But I'm not an "insider" so I don't necessarily feel compelled to leap to its defence. Perhaps someone should play a bit of "devil's advocate" here. Would it be worthwhile, Rahul, to probe Mr. Bodnar a bit on this matter? That is: "Why do you feel this way?".... "Are there facts (complaints, etc.) that justify the comment or is it a 'general perception'?".....etc... Point is: Maybe there is something to be learned here so it might first be useful to understand the authors meaning, sources, and motivation. Further: As Linux Desktop moves, rapidly it seems, from the tech world (where Fedora shines) to the consumer world, facts become less important and give way to perception. Jessica Simpson TV ad on 1080i HDTV: "I totally don't know what it is but I want it". Pretty much says it all. If Mr. Bodnar is conveying a perception felt within the general Linux public it's important to understand that and deal with it. Rick -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
