chasd wrote:
At our company, we have found that phone conferences are very
productive, but unless there is a transcriptionist, what each person
takes away from that conversation isn't always the same. And the
contents of the conversation is not available to those not on the
conference call.
Slap down a digital voice recorder next to the phone speaker and post an
OGG later.
See
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006-November/msg00206.html
I think we found a happy go between by using #fedora-board IRC channel
to have a running commentary on the discussions to a appropriate level
of detail and getting input from community folks to continue the phone
conversations. This worked out pretty well for the summit itself and I
think we will continue that process for the future board meetings too.
( I think there has been a great deal of progress FC5 => FC6 _outside_
of the versions on the packages that are on the discs )
Speed isn't that important to me because Fedora will never be "done" -
there isn't really a finish line.
Precisely. It would be good to hear what progress you think we have made
though. At the organizational level, the package versions arent really
interesting. Every Fedora release will progress over the previous one
with packages anyway. What's important is the other changes we make
which is why the next release of Fedora is going to be pretty important
even if the end product ends up being a conservative set of changes this
time.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
