Tejas Dinkar wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 19:50 -0400, Jeremy Hogan wrote:
I just don't se why they can't acknowledge that Fedora is great, which
makes RHEL even greater.
They way I see it,
RHEL is just a way for Red Hat to get some money, so they can invest it
into improving Fedora.
In any case, I object to the quoted statement.
What's so great about RHEL anyway, that it is greater than fedora?
--T
What's so great about an apple that makes it greater than a orange sort
of question. I dont think thats the argument presented anywhere. RHEL is
better suited for a certain class of people and industries who want a
longer lifecycle, support agreements among other benefits. Obviously if
Red Hat thought that RHEL is always greater than Fedora, it wouldnt be
investing anything in Fedora at all.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
